HIV/AIDS, VACCINES AND POPULATION CONTROl

Dr Douglass wrote a report titled “WHO Murdered Africa” in 1987 in which he accused the World Health Organisation of having spread the AIDS disease in Africa through inoculation.  W.H.O Murdered Africa is a declarative statement but not a question. Dr Douglass quotes an article in the WHO bulletin, Vol 47, p259, 1972 calling on scientists to work with deadly retroviruses to attempt to make a hybrid virus that would be deadly to humans. It read, “An attempt should be made to see if viruses can in fact exert selective effect on immune function. The possibility should be looked into that the immune response to viruses itself may be impaired of the infecting virus damaging, more or less selectively, the cell responding to the virus”. Doesn’t that sound like AIDS? In plain English WHO is saying let’s cook up a virus that selectively destroys the T-cell system of man, an acquired immune deficiency.

In the Strecker Memorandum, Dr Strecker has said that HIV is a combination of the bovine leukemia virus of cows and visna virus of sheep. These viruses are not reactive to human beings but can be adapted to infect humans. They are retro-viruses, meaning that they can change the genetic composition of cells that they enter. Dr Snead says all vaccines are totally unsafe. The flu vaccine itself is prepared on chicken embryo, an unborn chicken, which means that people who are allergic to these products like egg and chicken can become ill.

On the other hand, the injection of these proteins into other humans will render them, in a large percentage, allergic to chicken and egg which means that people who were not allergic before will now become allergic. The other problem is that all viral vaccines contain not only the particular virus but they also contain traces of leukemia virus, cancer-producing viruses etc. These are not completely removable, they exist in the chicken from which these eggs are taken and although they claim that they are 98% purified, 2% of several billion viruses is still an awful lot of cancer and leukemia. Dr Snead also pointed out that to separate cells, a pork product may have to be used which is made from raw pork stomach. It is an enzyme that separates the cells called pork trypsin and a lot of people who would not ingest or take pork products for religious or other reasons are seduced without knowing it into violating their convictions. That is why it is not wise to take influenza vaccines.

According to Dr Snead there is no science, credible or otherwise, that can test for something that hasn’t happened. You can’t test, compared to what? If they deliberately put a variety of viruses in the public then they will say we were right, virus A or virus B will be endemic this year. It is a self-fulfilling prophesy because they created that particular problem and not only that but the other thing is that some years back some people who had a problem of the nervous system and encephalitis had been exposed to the flu virus. Dr Snead has written an interesting book on the same subject titled “Some call it Aids I call it Murder”. Dr Leonard Horowitz also says that there are risks associated with immunization. The chances of a serious adverse reaction to the diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus (DPT) vaccine were 1 in 1750, while the chances of a child so vaccinated dying from pertussis each year were 1 in several million. (Pertussis is an infectious disease due to Bordetella pertussis and characterized by coryza, bronchitis, and a typical explosive cough ending in growing or whooping inspiration).

Dr Horowitz learned of a child who had been permanently disabled by a vaccine, so he investigated. According to his report, Health authorities credit vaccines for disease declines, and assure us of their safety and effectiveness. Yet these assumptions are directly contradicted by government statistics, medical studies, Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control reports and reputable research scientists from around the world. In fact, infectious diseases declined steadily for decades prior to vaccinations. US doctors report thousands of serious vaccine reactions each year including hundreds of deaths and permanent disabilities, fully vaccinated populations have experienced epidemics, and researchers attribute dozens of chronic immunological and neurological conditions to mass immunization programmes.

There are hundreds of published medical studies documenting vaccine failure and adverse effects, and dozens of books written by doctors, researchers, and independent investigators that reveal serious flaws in immunization theory and practice. Most pediatricians and parents are completely unaware of these findings. However, this has begun to change in recent years, as a growing number of parents and health care providers around the world are becoming aware of the problems and starting to question the use of widespread mandatory vaccines.

Dr Horowitz is not telling anyone whether or not to vaccinate, but rather, with the utmost urgency, to point out some very good reasons why everyone should examine the facts before deciding whether or not to submit to the procedure. As a parent he says he was shocked to discover the absence of a legal mandate or professional ethic requiring pediatricians to be fully informed, and to see first-hand the prevalence of physicians who are applying practices based on incomplete – and in some cases, outright misinformation. His report contains sufficient evidence to warrant further investigation by all concerned. He also says that most pediatricians have staked their identities and reputations on the presumed safety and effectiveness of vaccines, and thus have difficulty acknowledging evidence to the contrary. The misconceptions about this subject have deep roots. In this regard Dr Horowitz has written a book titled “Emerging Viruses: Aids and Ebola”.

By Sam Ditshego